Why Akufo-Addo and Bawumia avoid accountability: A call for transparency
In Ghana, accountability is a crucial issue. It ensures that leaders are responsible for their actions and decisions. Recently, former President John Mahama challenged the current President Nana Akufo-Addo and Vice President Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia to hold themselves accountable in light of the recent Airbus scandal investigation.
This call raises important questions about why Akufo-Addo and Bawumia seem reluctant to submit to the same scrutiny that Mahama faced.
The Airbus scandal and its implications
The Airbus scandal involved allegations of bribery during the procurement of military aircraft. Mahama, who was accused of being involved, has been cleared of any wrongdoing by the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP). During their investigation, the OSP found no evidence linking him to bribery or corruption. Mahama’s exoneration highlights the importance of transparency in governance and sets a precedent for accountability among public officials.
In contrast, Akufo-Addo and Bawumia have not faced similar investigations despite calls for them to do so. Mahama has publicly stated that if he could be investigated, the current leaders should also be subject to the same level of scrutiny. This raises concerns about the integrity of the current administration and its commitment to accountability.
The importance of accountability
Accountability is vital for any democratic society. It builds trust between the government and its citizens. When leaders are held accountable, it discourages corruption and promotes good governance. Mahama’s willingness to undergo scrutiny serves as a model for other leaders. He stated,
Let no one cry foul when Akufo-Addo and Bawumia are subjected to the same standard of accountability post-7th January, 2025
The reluctance of Akufo-Addo and Bawumia to embrace accountability raises questions about their leadership. Critics argue that they should take responsibility for the economic challenges facing Ghana, such as rising inflation and a weakening currency.
As the head of the economic management team, Bawumia was expected to deliver on his promises, yet many Ghanaians feel disappointed with the results.
Political pressure and public perception
Political pressure plays a significant role in the accountability debate. The ruling New Patriotic Party (NPP) has faced criticism for its handling of various issues, including the economy and corruption. Members of the NPP often defend their leaders, arguing that they should not be subjected to the same scrutiny as their predecessors. However, this argument weakens the call for a transparent government where all leaders are held to the same standards.
The public perception of Akufo-Addo and Bawumia is shaped by their actions, or lack thereof, regarding accountability. Many citizens are calling for greater transparency and are skeptical of the government’s commitment to fighting corruption. If the leaders continue to avoid accountability, they risk losing public trust, which is essential for effective governance.
The path forward
To restore faith in Ghana’s leadership, Akufo-Addo and Bawumia must embrace accountability. They should be willing to undergo investigations similar to those faced by Mahama. This would demonstrate their commitment to transparency and good governance. As Mahama stated, “President Akufo-Addo and Vice President Bawumia should subject themselves to equal scrutiny and transparency”.
By holding themselves accountable, they can set a positive example for future leaders. It is essential for the health of Ghana’s democracy that all public officials are held to the same standards. This will not only enhance public trust but also strengthen the country’s institutions.
In conclusion, the call for accountability from Mahama is a crucial step toward ensuring that Ghana’s leaders are responsible for their actions. Akufo-Addo and Bawumia must respond positively to this challenge to foster a culture of transparency and integrity in governance.
